Policy Quarterly Volume 5 Number 2
It was a salutary experience for many who attended the event. This was not merely because of the nature and scale of the challenges we confront, but also because the disjunction between the empirical evidence (i.e. concerning what actually works to reduce offending) and the policy prescriptions often favoured by governments. Too often, it seems, governments are inclined to adopt policies which simply do not work, or at least do little to improve overall social outcomes. The National-led government’s proposal to introduce ‘boot camps’ provides a classic example: politically attractive but empirically flawed.
An immediate output of the symposium was the publication of a book edited by Dr Maxwell – Addressing the Causes of Offending: What is the Evidence? Four of the substantive chapters contained in this volume are included, albeit with some additions and deletions, in this issue of Policy Quarterly. First, Professor Tony Ward discusses the various philosophical justifications for state-inflicted punishment, and the ethical challenges that some of these justifications create for clinicians and others working in the criminal justice system. Next, Judge Andrew Becroft (the Principal Youth Court Judge) explores the nature of the youth justice system in New Zealand and outlines some of the options for improving this system and thus reducing the likelihood of re-offending. Following this, Dr Cindy Kiro (the Children’s Commissioner, 2003-09) reflects on the causes of offending and, on the basis of the available evidence, argues that the most cost-effective approaches involve early intervention, so that children have the best possible start in life. Finally, Kim Workman (a former head of the prison service in New Zealand) makes a strong plea for policy makers to give greater attention to the crucial issue of prisoner integration. In so doing, he highlights the ideas of Winston Churchill (when he was the Liberal Home Secretary in Britain in 1910) and the failure of governments, both here in New Zealand and elsewhere, to act on Churchill’s advice to put in place adequate community support for released prisoners.
The remaining articles in this issue of Policy Quarterly cover four very different policy matters. Len Cook and Robert Hughes explore the implications of the global financial crisis (and the resulting economic recession) for New Zealand’s public sector. Drawing on their extensive experience in public management and the lessons arising from previous economic downturns, they outline a strategic approach for achieving greater value for money, particularly in relation to the delivery of public services and the management of capital investments, including priority setting for new investments.
Next Mike Reid critically assesses the recent report of the Royal Commission on Auckland Governance and the policy response of the National-level government. In so doing, he highlights the risks associated with the government’s decision to reject some of the Royal Commission’s central recommendations – especially its rejection of the Commission’s proposal for six local councils (with the framework of a unitary authority) and its preference instead for the establishment of 20-30 local boards (the powers and functions of which remain vague).
On a very different theme, Andy Reisinger provides an update on the evolving science of climate change since the publication in 2007 of the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. He focuses particularly on two areas where significant advances in the science have occurred in recent years – the risk of an accelerated rise in sea level from the loss of polar ice, and evidence that the window of opportunity to stabilise greenhouse gas concentrations at low levels is closing rapidly. An early indicator of whether the global community has the courage and fortitude to respond to such evidence will be the success or otherwise of the major UN climate conference in Copenhagen in December this year.
To conclude this issue of Policy Quarterly I explore the origins, nature and implications of the unusual inter-party governance arrangements that have been crafted in New Zealand under proportional representation, especially since 2005. Such arrangements not merely highlight the flexible nature of the country’s constitutional framework, but also pose an interesting puzzle: why have other countries with much longer histories of multi-party parliaments not experimented with such devices, and will New Zealand yet again serve as a model for others to follow?
Jonathan Boston
ISBN:
Published in May 2009
